Category Archives: Vatican

Rev. Thomas Rosica reflects on papal transition

thomas rosica

Rev. Thomas Rosica was the official Vatican spokes-person for English media during the heady days of a papal resignation, the sede vacante, and the subsequent election of Pope Francis. The Canadian priest arrived at the Holy See Press Office with solid experience and impressive credentials. He organized the World Youth Day in Toronto, Canada in 2002. He founded and led Salt and Light Catholic Television Network in Canada since 2003. He also served as the Vatican-appointed media attaché at two world Synods of Bishops in 2008 and 2012.

Rosica gives us a fascinating look into the Lenten season that we will never forget. A personal, inside story of an historic papal transition is a both a reflection on the actual events, and a testimony to his deep love for the church. It was a moment in time when eyes and cameras around the world were glued to St. Peter’s Basilica, waiting with baited breathe for each piece of news. He writes,

Questions coming to us at press conferences and briefings revealed an immense interest in things church! From the colour of the retired pontiff’s shoes, to the papal seals that would be put on the papal apartments, to the destruction of the ring of the fisherman and papal seals, to modified, detailed rules and regulations for conclave behaviour, to the chemical products that would be used to produce the smoke. . . the world was watching and listening.

I chuckled several times thinking that the church had made such great strides these past years in the area of social communications. But for such a major event and happening as a conclave, we still relied on smoke signals.

To read more

Leave a Comment

Filed under Vatican

Pope Francis and the LCWR

Gerhard Müller, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, reported that Pope Francis has re-affirmed the need for a reform of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (the organization representing 70% of US women religious) and approved the critical “evaluation” that was published last year by the CDF, including the demand that the Sisters cooperate with individual bishops and the US Episcopal Conference.

The initial assessment and subsequent demands issued to the LCWR resulted in a massive outpouring of support for the social justice work done by American women religious. Many believed that the assessment was another example of heavy-handed control by the hierarchy. The nuns were being treated more harshly than child abusing clergy and the bishops who actively covered their tracks. The more skeptical believed that the bishops, whose dioceses face financial ruin due to the sexual crises, were trying to get their hands on the property owned by some of these religious congregations.

Critics of the LCWR were happy with the crack-down, believing that the women had become too progressive and should embrace the growing trend of more traditional orders back to convents, habits and strict obedience.

Support or critique for the LCWR is clearly divided along the usual ideological camps.

The initial response from more progressive Catholics to the papacy of Pope Francis has been almost unanimously positive. His calls for a more simple church with a preferential option for the poor has resonated with all who have been discouraged with the increased focus on liturgical and doctrinal purity and clericalism of recent years. His words and actions gave reason to hope that change will come.

The news that Francis is supporting the LCWR crack-down has shattered this hope for many. It has been likened to post-honeymoon blues; that it was all too good to be true. This pope will be like the one before him. Nothing has changed.

Others are encouraging a more optimistic, cautious approach. I put myself squarely in this camp.

These are the early days of a new papacy. It is impossible for Francis to know the intricacies of each issue that he has inherited. It is impossible to fix each mess overnight. Perhaps we shouldn’t read too much into Müller’s words. Saying the pope has allowed the work of the LCWR assessment to continue is not the same as giving the content of the work his stamp of approval.

Pope Francis has granted only provisional approval to all the Congregational heads. None of the prefects are guaranteed their positions at this point. Francis needs time to catch up on all the issues he inherited, to discern where the weaknesses lie and their root causes. He needs to identify and vet persons who have the gifts and back-bone to move forward with all that is good, and reform all that isn’t. With all that is on his plate, it is probable that he has not had enough time to study the nuances of the LCWR issue, or to dialogue with the parties involved.

As with politics and life, many in the church have a personal issue that becomes a focal point of their energies and passion. This is good and needed. The value of lobby groups is that they invest time and energy into researching and keeping on top of developments with a specific issue. They also ensure that an important issue is not forgotten or swept aside.

The dark side of becoming too focused on an issue is that we expect everyone to share our passion, and give it prioritized attention. We judge the effectiveness of a political party, ruling government, or leader by how they have responded to our demands. Their general success or failure depends on their success or failure in promoting and defending our agenda.

Of course, the future of the LCWR is more than an “agenda” for the religious women involved. At the core of the issue is one of heavy handed power and a deep lack of respect given to women who have given their lives for the service of God and God’s people. Justice is demanded for them, and hopefully it will come.

I am not ready to write Pope Francis off yet based on this one news story. Swift judgments are easy to make. I, and many others have made many swift judgments about our new pope based on the integrity of his words; words that are reflected in many simple gestures.

I’m going to hold on to those first, swift and positive judgments. I’m still enjoying the newness of the feeling; a feeling of hope for our church. I’m not ready to let go of the honeymoon yet.

3 Comments

Filed under popes, Vatican, women in the church

amidst struggles, confusion and despair, I believe

Prairie_Messenger_Header_Op

Here is another column I wrote for the Prairie Messenger. It’s another reflection on my recent visit to Rome and St. Peter’s Basilica.

Amidst struggles, confusion and despair, I believe

5 Comments

Filed under popes, Vatican, Vatican II

UPDATE: German court: Catholics who don’t pay religious tax must leave church | National Catholic Reporter

UPDATE: German court: Catholics who don’t pay religious tax must leave church | National Catholic Reporter.

The above article on NCR adds more details to the story coming out of Germany about Catholics being refused the sacraments if they opt out of paying the Church Tax. As with all news stories, one must be cautious about believing sensational head lines. And this head-line, to our North American sensibilities, is sensational indeed. It raised my ire when I first read about it, but I kept hoping that perhaps there was some miscommunication…some cultural nuance that we were missing.

Well, recent statements by Archbishop Robert Zollitsch of Freiburg, president of the German Bishop’s Conference, leave no room for nuance…

Clearly, someone withdrawing from the church can no longer take advantage of the system like someone who remains a member,

The church is a ‘system’ that we ‘take advantage’ of? What happened to graces freely given and freely received? What about the institutional church taking advantage of the people she is called to serve?

“We are grateful Rome has given completely clear approval to our stance.”

What??? This kind of bullying tactic has the approval of the Vatican? This does not bode well for the “New Evangelization”. While bishops from around the world prepare to gather next month to discuss how to draw souls back to the the faith, some are intentionally alienating those who are struggling to stay in the midst of this mess. They just don’t get it!!!

The archbishop said each departure was “painful for the church,” …and “The Catholic church is committed to seeking out every lost person.”

OK, call me a skeptic…but is the pain coming from lost souls, or lost income?

“At issue, however, is the credibility of the church’s sacramental nature. One cannot be half a member or only partly a member. Either one belongs and commits, or one renounces this,”

I respectfully disagree – vehemently – with the good bishop. There are many good souls in our church who struggle with certain teachings or issues. In the midst of their struggles, some stay. Some need to take a voluntary exile to ponder and rethink their faith. Some just cannot afford to give large donations to the church. Some choose not to give financial support as a protest. Through it all, many still identify themselves as Catholics. After all, the sacrament of baptism is indelible. Do not judge our faith or our commitment based on the money we give. It is not only unfair. It is offensive.

In his opening address Monday to the bishops’ meeting, Zollitsch said the church needed “a long perspective, deep breath and patience” to cope with current challenges, as well as a capacity for dialogue with “social groups and circles alienated from the church.”

This really does have to be the kicker! Spot the hypocrisy anyone? This comment screams a lack of understanding. Yes, WE need to take a long, deep breath and have patience with these church leaders. Their actions and tone reflect an authoritative need for control and power, not a desire for dialogue. They need to take a closer look at the cause of the alienation of so many from our church. Perhaps a mirror would help in this regard.

Sigh….. Please forgive my own tone in this rant. Anger does little for dialogue. But sometimes I just need to let off some steam…

6 Comments

Filed under leadership in the church, obedience, priests and bishops, Vatican

LCWR, Cardinal Levada and the dialogue of the deaf

For all who have been following the tale of the doctrinal assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), today was a big day. LCWR president Franciscan Sr. Pat Farrell and executive director St. Joseph Sr. Janet Mock met in Rome with Cardinal William Levada, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), and Archbishop J. Peter Sartain, the Vatican delegate appointed to oversee the assessment in the US.

The official press releases following the meeting were anti-climactic. The Vatican Press gave an official announcement that reiterated the authority of the Holy See over the sister’s conference, and the role of the CDF in ensuring that the LCWR is in union with the Magisterium. The press release from the LCWR was simple. The sisters were returning to the US to discuss the results of the meeting on regional levels and at their annual assembly in August. No interviews were going to be given.

I was musing on this all day, wondering if there was anything worth writing about. Perhaps all had been said to this point. But something still didn’t seem right. Did any actual dialogue take place? I wrote a blog post for NCR Today, but hesitated sending it in. I kept checking the National Catholic Reporter web-site for more news, and there was nothing. So, I sent off my wee piece. Almost simultaneously, John Allen Jr. posted an interview with Cardinal Levada, the Prefect of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Faith. Now here is a story!

The Cardinal describes a `dialogue of the deaf“ with the women of the LCWR. The deafness, he believes, comes from not wholeheartedly embracing the doctrinal assessment of the CDF and accepting the proposals for reform that are being presented to them.

In the short term, Levada said he would take as evidence that things are moving in the right direction if LCWR enters into “a sincere, cordial and open dialogue” with Archbishop J. Peter Sartain of Seattle, tapped by the Vatican to oversee the reform envisioned in the doctrinal assessment.

To date, Levada said, that hasn’t happened. 

Cardinal Levada also spoke openly about the possibility of the LCWR cutting their official ties with the Vatican.

So, the LCWR has chosen silence in order to pray, ponder, and dialogue among their membership before any statements or actions are taken. Theirs is a dignified approach. Cardinal Levada, meanwhile, has already put his opinions and musings into the limelight for all to see as if it was a fait accompli. And he has taken a very undignified dig at the sisters with his ‘dialogue of the deaf’ comment.

The story is far from over. My prayers and hopes are with the sisters that they will continue to face this challenge with grace, dignity, and faith in their communal wisdom. As to the deafness in the dialogue…may all ears and hearts be open to the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

8 Comments

Filed under religious sisters, Vatican, women in the church

Today in church history – John XXIII drops Vatican II bombshell

I was born on January 9, 1959. I am as old as Madonna (the singer, not the Blessed Virgin),Donny Osmond (my teenage crush) and Barbie (the doll). I also consider myself a Vatican II baby. On January 25, a couple of weeks after I was born, Blessed John XXIII announced to a shocked group of Curial Cardinals that he was going to summon an Ecumenical Council. The announcement was made at the grand Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls, on the Feast of the Conversion of St. Paul. The great Pope describes his inspiration as a great light, well in tune with the scripture readings of this feast day. The reaction of those present was reminiscent of the great saint’s tumble off his horse.

On October 11, 2012, the Church will be commemorating the 50th anniversary of the opening of the Second Vatican Council. The National Catholic Reporter will be publishing various articles on this great historical event. Today’s essay, Curial horror greeted John XXIII’s announcement of ecumenical council, gives a great description of the announcement made 53 years ago, today.

20120125-221017.jpg

2 Comments

Filed under church history, popes, Vatican

Vatican reaches out to bloggers and discuss mutual relationship

Vatican reaches out to bloggers and discuss mutual relationship.

May 3, 2011. (Romereports.com) The Vatican met with a group of Catholic bloggers of all ages, that come very every corner of the world. The Pontifical council in charge of communications accepted requests to attend and chose 150 bloggers based on their nationality, language, and the basis of their blog…The Vatican said it held the meeting with these bloggers not to try and control their writing but rather to develop a relationship with them and a code of conduct. In the end, both sides agreed that they would need each other.

I heard about this meeting after the fact, and was intrigued. My first thought was that the select few would be hand-picked for their conservatism and promotion of all things Vatican. I wouldn`t have blamed the organizers for taking this approach. Any organization would do the same – hand-pick your staunchest defenders, and gather them together in one room. Acknowledge their work and encourage them in future endeavours. After all, supportive bloggers can be a great PR tool. And, they work for cheap!

My second thought was that the powers that be had an agenda, to lay down the ground rules for Catholic bloggers. After all, some might fear the freedom of speech of the blogging world.

So, off I went to do some cyber-surfing to find out more. The best place for commentary and reports was – of course – blogs!

OSV Daily Take  is an online newsletter from Our Sunday Visitor, and gave daily reports from the meeting. Elizabeth Scalia, a panelist and managing editor of the British blog, The Anchoress, stated that ”Catholic clarity cannot be disseminated without a measure of charity. This charity can sometimes be difficult to find on the Internet.”

Fr. Antonio Spadaro, S.J. moderated a panel discussion with five Vatican representatives. OSV Daily Take  reported,

Spadaro began the panel by explaining that when it comes to blogging, “the Church needs to listen.” Blogging, in particular, is a medium used to get the message out. Everyone wants their voice to be heard, everyone wants to be known. But dialogue also requires a willingness to listen, to be open to new ideas. And that’s precisely what the Church and all the bloggers present are hoping to do at this conference. We are called, first of all, to listen.

One bishop described how he checks a number of Catholic blogs each day to gauge the grass-roots response to current issues and news. It helps him to know how others are interpreting recent documents and pronouncements from the Church. Has an issue been misinterpreted? Does anything need to be clarified? (I`m sorry, but I forgot where I read this…too much speedy surfing and not enough referencing.)

The fact that the Vatican had this meeting shows its ongoing openness to new communications and its acknowledgment that there is much to learn from the grass-roots. Bishops are encouraged to continue the conversation with bloggers on the local level. I hope that the goal will continue to be one of dialogue and mutual respect, and not a witch-hunt. Bishops who subscribe to the see, judge and stifle approach of leadership will soon find out that it is impossible to silence the growing cyber-space community.

As a blogger, I believe that responsibility comes with freedom of speech. My blog`s title reminds me each day to promote an inclusive dialogue. It requires a lot of discipline to walk that fine line between challenging and questioning honestly, and resorting to angry rants and tirades.   But, none of us are perfect, and we all need a good rant at times. There will be times when we fail at charity. I pray that we won`t be judged too harshly when we do.

2 Comments

Filed under catholic dialogue, Vatican

Australian priests offer support for deposed bishop | National Catholic Reporter

Australian priests offer support for deposed bishop | National Catholic Reporter.

It`s tough being a Catholic these days. A friend recently shared how she is ready to give up reading the National Catholic Reporter, a publication that we all respect for its commitment to reporting on current church events and issues. It`s not that the NCR isn`t doing a great job. But it seems that each day there is another story to get heated over. Another reason to sigh deeply. Another reason to wonder why we remain Catholic.

The latest news is coming from down-under. Bishop William Morris of the Toowoomba Diocese is being relieved of his duties and position by Pope Benedict XVI. According to the article, the reason is traced back to an Advent 2006 Pastoral letter from Bishop Morris. While describing the current priest shortage in his diocese, he stated that he would be willing to ordain married men and women `if Rome allowed`. This letter resulted in an apostolic visitation from Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver. Bishop Morris was not allowed to see the results of the visitation or the report that was sent to the Congregation for Bishops. All he received was the personal letter from the Pope announcing his episcopal removal.

Granted, we do not know all the details of the situation. But it has raised a lot of questions and concerns about the judicial process and the severity of the punishment.

What brings some hope is that a national organization of priests in Australia has released a public statement of support for Bishop Morris. This is good news. We need priests, bishops and lay women and men to stand up for each other if they believe an injustice has been done.

6 Comments

Filed under leadership in the church, priests and bishops, Vatican, women in the church

blessed john paul II – the day after

I watched the moment of beatification of John Paul II live on CNN. It was about 3:30 am our time. The commentators repeated the ongoing controversies surrounding his fast-track to sainthood in the midst of the sexual abuse scandal. Meanwhile, the cameras showed waves of supporters flying flags and ecstatically welcoming the present pontiff, Benedict XVI, as he circled St. Peter`s square in the pope-mobile. It was reminiscent of the Royal wedding just days before. The cheering crowds on the TV screens seemed to make a mockery of the negative media coverage.

Of course, only die-hard Royal or Papal fans would brave the inconvenience of long lines and claustrophobic crowds to be physically present at either event. And much money was spent at each for effective security measures. Both the wedding and the beatification were blessed with sunny skies despite dire forecasts. Both were beautiful, photogenic moments for the history books.

As the tapestry was unveiled at the moment of beatification, I had an unexpected emotional moment. The portrait chosen was of JPII in the early years of his papacy. This was the strong, athletic Pole who had survived World War II and helped to bring down the iron curtain in Eastern Europe. This was the younger Pope who had inspired so many on his energetic travels around the world. These were exciting years of hopeful renewal, of reminders to `be not afraid` because our faith will help to conquer all the evils of the world.

We need hope in our church and world today. And, we all need our heroes. As we change with the growing years, our heroes may change with us. When the halos of our heroes are tarnished, we yearn for the nostalgia and passion of earlier times. And because we are a diverse people, we will never share the same depth of affection or acceptance of the heroes that the Church offers to us. We should accept this without undue or harsh judgment of each other.

Yesterday was a moment of great celebration for many in our church, and indeed in our world. We need celebrations to lighten the heart and energize the spirit. But all parties end. The true test of a celebration comes in the morning after.

5 Comments

Filed under popes, Vatican

beatification and JPII

John Allen Jr. , Vatican correspondent for the National Catholic Reporter, is devoting his daily blog this week to the May 1st Beatification of John Paul II. As usual, he attempts to give a balanced perspective on events and issues. Yesterday, he wrote about the continued popularity of this pope despite the fact that his life was often a sign of contradiction . The contradictions have led many to question the wisdom of beatifying the late pope so swiftly.

The most cited reason for delaying or denying the beatification is John Paul II`s lack of action against priests and bishops accused of sexual abuse. Some ultra-traditionalists object to the inter-religious dialogue promoted by John Paul in Assisi, claiming it led to a rise in relativism. Many liberals object to his firm stance against women`s ordination, liberation theology, and the silencing of many theologians.

Despite the controversy, there is no denying the popularity of Pope John Paul II. At the time of his death, the crowds in St. Peter`s square held up banners… Santo Subito – Sainthood Now! That is how holy women and men were recognized as saints in the early days of the church. People saw their sanctity, and celebrated it spontaneously. Many Catholics believe in the sainthood of John Paul II, whether it is officially sanctioned or not.

I wish that it could have been left at this simple and personal level. Patient waiting would have allowed for more dialogue in the midst of the controversy. The Vatican will be paying $6 million for the Beatification ceremonies. Maybe it is not the right moment for Cardinals and Bishops to be parading in all their glory and finery as they elevate one of their own towards sainthood. Or perhaps it will be a much needed PR moment for the Church during these dark days of scandals. Time will tell.

4 Comments

Filed under popes, Vatican