do not be masters of doctrine

During an ordination ceremony on Sunday, Pope Francis stressed that

…priests are not “masters of doctrine” but must be faithful to it. Francis described the pain he feels when he hears of people that no longer go to confession because they fear being told off; they felt the church was slamming the door in their face. “Please don’t do this,” Francis urged priests, stressing the importance of mercy.

The next day, he spent an hour in a question and answer session with seminarians and young priests in Rome in which he stressed the danger of “academicism”,

“There are four pillars to a priest’s education:” “spiritual education, academic education, community education and apostolic education.” “I would not be able to understand a priest who comes to study for a degree here in Rome but doesn’t lead a community life – this will not do – or who does not look after their spiritual life, taking part in daily mass, daily prayer, the lectio divina and personal prayer with the Lord.” “Academic purism is not good” in this sense. If you only focus on the academic side, there is a danger of slipping into ideology and this is not healthy” because we become “macrocephalus” and “this is bad, it is a sickness.”

I agree wholeheartedly. We need doctrine. We need academics who are willing to do the hard work of studying the faith in order to teach others. What we do not need are doctrinal bullies who use church teachings as a hammer of orthodoxy to force us into unquestioning submission. And, we do not need a narrow, judgmental view of faithfulness that focuses only on doctrinal “purisms” and disregards our personal relationship with God through prayer and our attempts to live this relationship in our works and deeds.

And, yet, the image of church leaders as masters of doctrine continues to not only haunt us but to also make its presence known. Recent headlines have been disheartening to say the least.

The religious women of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) are once again in the lime-light. In a recent meeting with Cardinal Gerhard Müller, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the women were told in no uncertain terms that they and their work are still under suspicion. (NCR has ongoing coverage of the LCWR story here.)

Theologians continue to be threatened with censure. The latest is Fr. Michael Amaladoss, a Jesuit from India and author of The Asian Jesus. The LCWR was also reprimanded by Cardinal Müller for awarding its 2014 Outstanding Leadership Award to “a theologian criticized by the Bishops of the United States because of the gravity of the doctrinal errors in that theologian’s writings.” This theologian is the well known and much respected Sr. Elizabeth Johnson.

“Masters of doctrine”, for me, brings with it images of past, inquisitorial times. Inquisitions are used to regain and maintain purity in the church, but at what cost? They encourage an atmosphere of accusations rather than dialogue, secrecy rather than transparency, and cruel emotional and spiritual torture rather than mercy.

Sadly, today’s inquisitions are showing a growing disconnect between the words and actions of Pope Francis. The reform that Francis has called for, the reform that has given so many of us hope, is in danger of morphing into the counter-reformation style of doctrinal purification that was the distinguishing factor of the previous two papacies.

If Pope Francis truly believes in a church of mercy, a church that does not slam its door in the faces of her own, it is time for him to rein in the modern day inquisitors.


6 thoughts on “do not be masters of doctrine

  1. I agree with you, Isabella. However, it seems to me that we have an abundance of priests and hierarchy who do not want to think themselves, and certainly don’t want any of us to think. They would rather see the world and theology in absolute, dualistic terms — everything is a one or a zero. It’s either right or wrong. There are no shades of gray. Perhaps it’s all because thinking leads to questions, and the questions and the answers may be uncomfortable, or might lead to uncertainty. The trouble with such a perspective is that it tends to box God in, creating God in our image, with all of our limitations and insecurities When we make God into a petty dictator, who will only smile upon a few select and who is more than happy to throw thunderbolts and wreak havoc, then it makes sense that we would behave that way towards others.
    I don’t know — just some random thoughts in reaction to what you wrote.

  2. Not random thoughts at all, Tatiana! I couldn’t agree with you more. It is much easier to see things in simplistic black-white, right-wrong, good-evil dichotomies that to struggle with the grey in-between areas. I never thought of our own actions reflecting our own image of God, but it’s so true. And, if it’s true, we SO need to focus on a loving God of mercy so our actions would reflect the same. Thank you so much for this!

  3. Reading this article made me think about how much energy has been put into making Catholic people co-dependent on the priesthood.

  4. And wouldn’t it be great if at least part of that energy were dedicated to enabling us to be fully-functioning, adult Christians?

Comments are closed.