corpus christi

image via Microsoft

Yesterday was Corpus Christi, or the Feast of the Body and Blood of Christ. The Eucharist, or Holy Communion, is central to our Catholic identity. It is the `source and summit` of our faith life and liturgical worship. Sadly, the theology surrounding this sacrament separates us from other Christian denominations. Ironically, it also divides us within our own Church.

When we receive Holy Communion under the appearance of bread and wine, we believe that it is really and truly the body and blood of Jesus and not just a sign or symbol of remembrance. We use dense words such as transubstantiation to try and explain the unexplainable. As with most mysteries, there are many layers and meanings beyond this core belief. Our theological or ideological leanings often determine which aspect is highlighted in our worship style. At the risk of over-simplifying or generalizing, traditionalists focus more on the real presence of Jesus in the consecrated bread and wine. Liberals or progressives focus more on the communal banquet table that feeds and unites us.

A focus on the real presence tends to place great importance on devotional practises and liturgical rites such as Eucharistic Adoration, Benedictions, and Corpus Christi processions. Individual piety and acts of devotion center on the Tabernacle and the consecrated host itself. It can be more exclusive, with high standards of who can and who cannot receive.

A focus on the communal aspect of Eucharist focuses on gathering in fellowship around the table of the Lord. The worship style is less formal and more communal, less focused on the person of the priest and more focused on the community. It tends towards inclusivity, with a desire to welcome all who come to the table.

A previous pastor used to focus on the real presence. His strong devotion was apparent in both his worship style and homilies. He often wore a Cope, a liturgical cape, changing vestments mid-way in the mass. After Communion, he dramatically kneeled in long prayer in front of the Tabernacle while we watched from the pews. Lengthy rules concerning reception of the Eucharist were repeatedly read in homilies and printed in bulletins. We had to bow – and he kept correcting how we bowed.

He preached that the most important place in the world was inside the four walls of the Church. Missing Mass was a grave sin. One First Communion Sunday, when pews were filled with non-Catholic family and friends unsure of when to sit and stand, he preached about Eucharistic miracles – hosts purportedly turning to real flesh and blood. I squirmed in the pew wondering what our visitors were thinking. What were the young boys and girls thinking? At the heart of his efforts was a deep devotion. But his methods were turning people away rather than drawing them in.

As with many aspects of our faith, the truth can be found in the middle of two extremes. If we truly believe in the sacramental presence of Jesus in the Eucharist then yes, we must receive with respect and devotion, ensuring that certain standards are in place. If we truly believe that it is a sacrament of love and unity, then we must also reflect this in how we welcome our sisters and brothers to the table.


a half-full, half-empty thought

NCR has an excellent editorial today called Theologians , bishops called to dialogue, trust. This response on the discussion board, submitted by George E. Bedingfield, is a real mind-blower…

Amid the intellectual and intricate religious binges of the learned and esteemed prelates who were gathered, an older man in the well-worn clothes of poverty, kneeling in the last pew, interrupted the concelebration when the petitions were finally finished and the presider said, “For what else should we pray?”

The voice was halting but surged forth with a very loud astounding resounding echo that filled the sanctuary and the entire cathedral,

May we somehow find a way to help each other pour out our half full and half empty glasses into the beautiful sharing chalice of the blood and love of Jesus until it is full and overflowing and keep it that way!


Theologians leave San Jose lifted after pondering saints | National Catholic Reporter

I`m not a theologian, but I love theology. I`m fascinated with our human attempt to describe things divine. In my younger years, I enjoyed the black and white discourse of apologetics – learning the rote answers and arguments for dogmatic truths. With age (and I like to think with wisdom!), those black and white answers were no longer enough. The old adage is true…the more you learn the less you know. Suddenly, I began seeing a lot more grey in the big questions of life. We cannot compress the eternal grandeur of God into a neat little package. We cannot claim to know all there is to know about the ineffable. In each time and place, we have new questions to ask, new issues to ponder.

And that is why we need our theologians. They have a passion and love for the study of God. No longer bound within the walls of monasteries and seminaries, the work of theology is now embraced by women and men in all corners of the world. The diversity of voices and experiences enriches the dialogue and deepens the discourse.

Thomas C. Fox of the National Catholic Reporter has written a wonderful, optimistic editorial about the recent gathering of the Catholic Theological Society of America.

Together these men and women remain convinced that studying books and pondering ideas about God, church, and world affairs, and the way these heady matters relate to one another can make a difference in the depths and qualities of our lives. But these pillars rest on others called respect, civil discourse and trust. Our Catholic faith, they will proudly remind you, is a “reasoned faith.” The gifts of intellect and open conversation matters….

via Theologians leave San Jose lifted after pondering saints | National Catholic Reporter.