radical catholic blogs: ignore or challenge?

Fr. Dwight Longenecker has written a commentary for Crux titled Radical Catholic blogs may be a cesspool, but saying so won’t help.  His article is a response to Fr. Thomas Rosica’s no holds barred condemnation of those who partake in “character assassinations” online. (See my previous post.) Rosica accused some Catholics of turning the Internet into “a cesspool of hatred, venom and vitriol, all in the name of defending the faith”. (The full address can be found here.)

Fr. Longenecker believes that lack of catechesis is partly to blame for the rise in extreme traditionalism or fundamentalism in the church. He writes,

In the wake of the Second Vatican Council, too much preaching and catechesis focused only on peace and justice issues, or presented a subjective and sentimental understanding of the Catholic faith. Pastors and catechists are not the only ones at fault. The Catholic faithful themselves have too often preferred a fuzzy, feel-good message.

Indifference, and indifferentism, have produced a notoriously lax and ineffectual form of American Catholicism.

Catholics who are looking for a faith with rigor, discipline and a tough line are invariably drawn to the traditionalist message.”

Longenecker believes that “Self-appointed online teachers fill the vacuum, and a poisonous, self-righteous extremism takes the place of true, simple, and humble piety.”

I agree that fundamentalism is fed on a perceived weakening and watering down of faith, a need to “get back to our roots”. Fundamentalism often morphs into an aggressive regression to simplistic, black and white thinking. Fundamentalism leaves little room for questioning and dialogue, for discerning personal circumstance and diversity. Fundamentalists often bully others into what they perceive as purity of belief and ritual.


Blaming a lack of catechesis and a “notoriously lax” Catholic populace is an over-used  tool for many clerics and lay alike. How many times were we told during discussions on the recent Synod on the Family that all problems in the family could be solved with more catechism classes? This is not only simplistic. It also bypasses the messiness of real encounter and true dialogue. It is easier to quote catechism and bible verses at a person than to immerse yourself in the reality of their life. It is easier to believe in and promote black and white teachings than to deal with the uncertainty of the grey, in-between.

Lonenecker did some online research on some of the “radical” Catholic blogs. The examples of nastiness that he lists show the lack of charity and basic human respect shown by these self-appointed arbiters of doctrinal purity. Their venom and vitriol prove that Fr. Rosica was justified in his condemnations.

Lonenecker ends the article on a note of resignation. There is no way to talk to these extremists, he believes, so we should simply ignore them.

Therefore, one must shrug, get on with the difficult calling of following Christ the Lord, and remember Rosica’s final comment: “We must pray for them, for their healing and conversion!


History is filled with religious and political ideologues whose incendiary words stoked the flames of bigoted hatred and division. Their modern day contemporaries surprise us with their seemingly effortless rise to power. How did they achieve such a strong voice? How did they get others to not only listen to them, but to believe and support what they are saying?

They do so by feeding on ignorance and despair, giving simple answers to complicated issues. They  promise heaven to those who feel the despairs of earthly existence. They target insecurities and feelings of inferiority by labelling and attacking the “other”. In doing so, their own egos are nourished.

Sorry, Father Lonenecker. Sure, we need to pray. We also need to shake off our complacency and speak out. We need to protect our church and our world from extremists, both religious and political.

Cesspools need to be called out for what they are. Shrugging them off will not take the smell away.

benedictine wisdom at the synod

Source: Could the synod of bishops fall flat? | Crux

The Synod on the Family is heading into the home stretch. Abbot Jeremias Schröder, president of the Congregation of Sant’Ottilia, is one of the Religious Superiors given voting delegate status at the synod. In an interview with Michael O’Loughlin of Crux, Abbot Schröder shared some insight into the Rule of Benedict and the challenges of a synod.

St. Benedict had a down to earth approach to community that acknowledged our human weakness. Monks are not an elite group of saints. Benedictines live diversity within community each day, acknowledging that the spiritual journey is unique for each monk.

“The rule of St. Benedict, in his wisdom, talks about encouraging the weak while not disheartening the strong,” he said. “In our tradition, it’s very clear that you take care of the needs of the individual, and at the same time, maintain the character of the community. Those two shouldn’t be played off against each other.”

He said it’s not true that “the moment you are lenient or merciful in the one instance, you weaken whole doctrine.”

“I think for a [member of a religious community], that it would be much easier to understand how these two do not harm each other,” he said.

During my years in leadership with the Marianist Lay Communities, I had the privilege of attending several Marianist General Chapters (Society of Mary and Daughters of Mary Immaculate. Both incorporate the Rule of Benedict into their Rules.) Chapters can be exhausting work, like synods. But, the Abbot believes that religious women and men have deep experience and wisdom gleaned from these gatherings.

“We have developed general chapters over centuries that are quite efficient in bringing positions together, fleshing out where the differences are, seeing what common ground there is, where we can move forward together,” he said, referring to the method of dialogue monasteries use to consider important questions about the life of the community.

One of the key differences between the synod and a monastery, however, is that monks pledge to live together for life, whereas a synod bishop will “go home afterward, and may not see his fellow synod fathers ever again,” he said.

“The fact that you know you’re bound together for life prevents you from going to the extremes. You don’t want to rock the boat, you’re aware you’re sitting in the same boat,” he said.

I experienced this in the three Chapters that I attended. Religious priests, brothers and sisters live in community unlike most diocesan priests and bishops. Community can truly be a “school for the Lord’s service” in the words of St. Benedict. It is one thing to have strong opinions, but living in community forces you to temper your opinions in seeking the common good.

As a Jesuit, Pope Francis knows the challenges of community. He also knows the importance of prayerful discernment. At the Santa Marta mass today, he preached on reading the signs of the times saying,

First of all, in order to understand the signs of the times we need silence: to be silent and observe. And afterwards we need to reflect within ourselves.

The first word in the Rule of Benedict is “Listen”. I hope that there was lots of prayerful listening both within and outside the synod halls.